| Abstract: |
Classical regression assumes precise data, which is unsuitable when
relationships and quantities are inherently vague. Fuzzy linear regression addresses this by allowing both variables and parameters to be fuzzy numbers,
restoring estimation reliability. In this article, we study two approaches to the
fully fuzzy model grounded in Zadeh’s extension principle: the theoretically established method of Wu [11], which analytically derives the membership functions of the regression coefficients, and the resampling-based method of Rosset
and Donzé [8], in which the fuzziness encoded in the data is itself resampled
to estimate the coefficients. The aim is to validate this distribution-free, easyto-implement resampling method against the benchmark provided by Wu’s approach. To ensure a fair comparison, the following new contributions are proposed. First, a Bound Profile Enumeration (BPE) scheme that exhaustively explores all bound combinations in Wu’s approximation is developed and implemented. For Rosset and Donzé’s method, a quantile-based clipping rule is introduced, addressing the sensitivity of the pmin,maxq rule to extreme values.
A principled criterion for selecting the number of resamples, derived from the
Dvoretzky–Kiefer–Wolfowitz inequality and Monte Carlo simulation, is also proposed and applied. The two methods are compared on Wu’s original dataset and
on the easySHARE dataset, using visual inspection and fuzzy-number metrics.
The resampling approach yields coefficients consistent with Wu’s while producing wider supports that typically encompass them, reflecting a richer modelling
of imprecision, which on easySHARE helps characterise the target variable, selfperceived health in the United States (sphus). These results establish the resampling approach as a credible, practical, and distribution-free alternative in the
fuzzy regression toolbox. |